– In most cases the wild version became extinct or extremely residual. Two common features are shared by most domesticated animals: Primitive man had plenty of time to accomplish that. Essentially all animals that could be domesticated were so long ago. Some animals can be domesticated, most cannot. They have a very similar aspect and interbreed easily, but they do look as different species in terms of behavior, and this is as important for evolution as morphology. Wolfs are specialized in large prey, while dogs are specialized in medium and small prey.
#HIGHTAIL EXPRESS VERSION 2.14 WINDOWS FREE#
The alpha dogs eat first, while reproduction is not curtailed and it is free for the taking. On the other hand dogs establish hierarchy through food access rights. Only the alpha couple reproduces and sex rights are strongly enforced. Wolfs establish hierarchy through reproductive rights. To me this is a serious issue in the theory that dogs are domesticated wolfs. Wolfs cannot be domesticated, they can only be tamed. Most species of canids can cross reproduce producing fertile offspring, violating one of the original definitions of species and showing that there is no possible way of defining the term species in a comprehensive and rigorous way. The genetics of the canids is a complete mess. You gotta eat and might as well have some fun with starving Romans in the meantime. Kill each other by the millions at times, completely out of control.Īlaric, a Visigoth, besieged Rome and fed his army with food headed for Rome while driving Romans into starvation. Then there are humans who act more like hyenas than humans. I’ve seen one, can’t be domesticated.ĭogs pack and can become wild. SubspeciesĜanis lupus familiaris Linnaeus, 1758 – domestic dogĬanis lupus x Canis lupus familiaris will not be the subspecies familiaris, too much wolf in the phenotype, not enough dog, it’ll be a wild animal. SpeciesĜanis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 – Wolf, Gray Wolf, Lobo gris, loup GenusĜanis Linnaeus, 1758 – dogs, foxes, jackals SuborderĜaniformia Kretzoi, 1938 – dog-like carnivoresįamilyĜanidae Fischer, 1817 – coyotes, dogs, foxes, jackals, wolves
OrderĜarnivora Bowdich, 1821 – cachorro do mato, carnívoro, gato do mato, lontra, carnivores, carnivores Subphylum Vertebrata – vertebrado, vertébrés, vertebratesĬlass Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758 – mammifères, mamífero, mammals PhylumĜhordata – cordés, cordado, chordates KingdomĚnimalia – Animal, animaux, animals Here’s the chart for each calculation (I even used that totally biased alarmist site SkepticalScience, so all you alarmists HAVE to accept my calculations as completely valid and indisputable).
That is less than half of the trend calculated by the alarmists for the same period!!!!1!!111!!!Īnd remember, this includes all the data in the time span, nothing is left out, so you can’t call this “cherrypicking”. We haven’t finished the current cycle, so it wouldn’t be scientific to include a partial cycle – that would introduce a bias.Īveraging all 7 trends together, we see that the average trend from 1970 to 2014 is 0.0796 degC/decade!
#HIGHTAIL EXPRESS VERSION 2.14 WINDOWS FULL#
I’ve calculated the trend in temperature for both kinds of full cycle – that makes 7 cycles that cover the timespan 1970 to 2014. Since 1970, when the so-called warming “trend” is supposed to have really gotten going, we have had 4 full solar cycles, measured peak-to-peak, and 3 full cycles measured trough-to-trough. So I’ve been doing some cherrypicking, and I think I’ve found a pretty good one – I hope Javier will chime in later to see if he can think of any ways to tweak it. Today’s topic the supervisors have handed me is to come up with a way to hide the incline in the surface temps since 1970, or to somehow confuse the perception of the trend in the temperature increase. With Javier enjoying a well earned day off from his trolling duties, Vladimir and Mr Tillerson have asked me to fill in as the climate denialist obfuscator for today (only).
0 kommentar(er)
